Monday, 30 December 2013

New Range Rover Sport SDV6 vs Porsche Cayenne Diesel

Will Range Rover’s all-new Sport outdrive Porsche’s Cayenne? Or will the Porsche do the harrying? We tell you which car called time out!

4
photos
New Range Rover Sport SDV6 vs Porsche Cayenne Diesel
  
When Land Rover launched the new Range Rover in 2012, people had to recalibrate their expectations of the brand. In its attempt to push the Range Rover even more upmarket, Land Rover created an SUV that not only got Rolls-Royce anxious about its hush-quotient, but also made ATVs sweat about their go-anywhere promise. So, expectations from the next all-new Range Rover – the Sport – are understandably high. To see if the Sport can live up to its name and set a new standard, we took the bread-and-butter RR Sport with the 3-litre V6 diesel to tear up some tarmac and pitted it against Porsche’s cool and capable Cayenne. So did the Sport outdo the sportiest luxury SUV yet?Continued..
Sizing it up
Standing between an Evoque and the Range Rover, it is apparent how much the Sport draws from both its siblings The Evoque’s sleekness wrapped over massive Range Rover proportions gives the Sport a special road presence to make it stand out in a sea of automobiles.
Under the skin, the Sport uses a modified version of the Range Rover’s all-aluminium platform. The Sport isn’t considerably smaller than its elder sibling and, in fact, the wheelbase is a scant one millimetre longer on the Sport while the width is the same. Sure, it is shorter in length but what sets the Sport apart is its lower stance. In comparison to the Range Rover flagship, the Sport looks like it has been slammed to the ground, the tapering roofline tightly wrapping
the cabin.
Though the Sport is much more hunkered down than the regular Range Rover, it still has an upright design which gives the Sport an airy cabin that is enhanced further by the beige leather interior. The design is understated and uncluttered as it was on the Range Rover with  luxury as a clear priority.
There is a sense of plushness everywhere you look or feel, be it in the way the indicator stalks work with a satisfying click, or the solid feel of the metal door handles. A 19-speaker Meridian sound system, perforated leather seats, three-zone climate control, 14-way adjustable front seats (yes, 14!), five camera angles, steering-mounted controls, a trick touch-screen that can display two different images at the same time, a full-length panoramic sunroof and a rear entertainment package with individual screens just go to show how loaded the Sport HSE trim is. In other markets, you can also opt for a third row of seats, but the decision hinges on how much you really need two extra seats as it involves jettisoning the spare wheel, and instead relying on a tyre repair kit. However, given the importance of the spare wheel in Indian conditions, Range Rover is not offering the 5+2 option as yet. Also, unless specified with a running board, older passengers will require a helping hand when getting in and out of the Range Rover, even with the height- adjustable suspension at its lowest setting. However, once perched inside, the view out of the cabin is simply panoramic.
If you peer out of the Range Rover Sport at the Porsche, the Cayenne will seem distinctly small. Although the tape measure will show that nose to tail the Cayenne matches the Sport for size, it is narrower and sits much lower. The soft, flowing lines and tumbling roofline are what make the Cayenne look compact and lighter still.
Standing next to the RR, the Cayenne seems almost humble in comparison. While you aren’t cramped for space, the Cayenne feels snug and intimate in comparison to the open and airy ambience of the Sport’s cabin.
There is a sense of occasion in the Cayenne’s cabin too. The centre console is littered with buttons that give the car a technical feel and the chrome accents strewn around the cabin look and feel rich. The omission of steering-mounted controls might gall some Cayenne buyers, but we would laud Porsche for sticking to the ethos that maintains purity of the driving experience. Eight-way adjustable seats and dual-zone climate control are offered as standard. However, the Cayenne too can be outfitted with a range of options from a 16-speaker Burmester sound system, a rear entertainment package, 18-way adjustable seats, four-zone climate control and many more. And the good thing is that even after ticking many of these options, the Cayenne’s price tag will undercut the Range Rover significantly.
The Porsche also springs a real surprise in the back seat as it offers better knee-room despite having a smaller wheelbase. It also offers better cushioned seats, although the transmission tunnel intrudes into the space available for the middle passenger. However, a serious blow to the Cayenne is that the diesel is offered only with a space saver. Also, unlike the Sport, the world over the Cayenne is a strictly two-row affair. Continued..
Power talk
All this matters very little for the person looking to buy a vehicle named Sport. So how Sporty is it? First, let’s talk about what’s under the hood. The Sport’s 2115kg is propelled by a smooth and refined 3-litre V6 diesel. Its 288bhp and 61kgm are further multiplied by the acclaimed eight-speed automatic from ZF. So does this Range Rover live up to its youthful moniker?
Although driving the Sport is a job that anyone would willingly accept, it is best enjoyed at a leisurely pace. Don’t expect instant gratification below 2000rpm and you needn’t be too gentle with the throttle pedal either. The Sport gets properly into its stride in the midrange, pulling smoothly from 2500rpm to its 4300rpm redline. The laidback eight-speed ZF gearbox shifts ratios unhurriedly when pressed for a kickdown. It is on open highways that the Sport feels at home as it cruises happily with barely a hint of diesel rumble inside the cabin. 
Now, if you quickly take a peek at the spec sheet, you’ll see that the Cayenne has roughly the same engine specs as the Sport but pumps significantly lesser power and torque. When you slip behind the wheel of the Cayenne after a stint in the RR Sport, you realise the cabin isn’t as isolated from the engine or road noise. But when it comes to driving, the Cayenne’s Audi-sourced 3-litre diesel is impressive. The motor feels  intuitive, responding to your right foot with
the required mix of promptness and eagerness. Light taps of the throttle pedal help this SUV flow smoothly through traffic. At the same time, making a lunge for gaps or passing other vehicles is easily done as the punchy motor spins freely to 4600rpm.
The VBOX data shows the Cayenne to be quicker than the Sport. At 100kph, the gap is under a second, but by 160kph it has widened to a second and a half.  The Cayenne keeps pace with the more powerful Sport in the dash from 20-80kph and edges past in the run from 40-100kph. Like the Range Rover, the Porsche too uses an eight-speed ZF gearbox but it feels like a different creature here. Keen and responsive, the gearbox actually sweetens the deal as it rips through gear-changes without making a hash of comfort. However, if you want to shift manually, the steering-mounted, push-pull rockers that replace traditional paddle-shifters will prove annoying to use.
Both SUVs come without adjustable damping; the Cayenne uses steel springs and the Range Rover is sprung with an air cushion. The Sport’s air suspension can be raised or lowered to three levels but it doesn’t adjust for a dynamic experience. Which means the soft and luxuriant low-speed ride doesn’t give way to a tighter and more controlled ride for higher speeds. The suspension tackles bad roads brilliantly and it’s only big potholes that shudder through.
High-speed shenanigans need to be tempered as there is some body roll but despite all its bulk, it’s quite easy to hustle the Sport. The accurate steering and responsive front end allow the big Sport to change direction with remarkable agility.
The Porsche, on the other hand, rides with a hint of firmness at low speeds and the road noise is more pronounced. The cabin is nowhere near as hushed as the Range Rover’s. Despite that, the ride is comfortable and becomes even more accommodating as speeds increase. On the highway, the Cayenne remains absolutely unflustered even as it darts around slower traffic. The Cayenne’s 215mm of ground clearance and 1705mm of height means it sits lower to the ground, so body roll is well contained. Nonetheless, the way this two-tonne SUV tears through corners is nothing short of staggering. The four-wheel-drive system transfers torque around the wheels to tighten and tidy your lines too. The crisp steering feels just right as the Cayenne sweeps through bends. Continued..
Cayenne and able
Quite simply, the Range Rover Sport is an excellent SUV that is best enjoyed in an unhurried way. If and when the need arises, you could drive it fast, but it is best enjoyed when driven in a more leisurely manner. Most owners won’t take it off-road but it’s when you get off the tarmac that it will go places the Cayenne wouldn’t dare venture.


    On the other hand, the Porsche Cayenne offers you a reason to drive your heart out every time you get in it. Despite its sporting edge, the Cayenne is surprisingly practical. It is spacious, comfortable, and enjoyable to drive everyday too.  If you want to be at the helm, then the Cayenne is it and a price tag that is nearly Rs 30 lakh lighter than that of the Sport only sweetens the deal. 

    New 2014 Honda City review, test drive

    We drive the 2014 Honda City diesel and petrol mid-size sedan on Indian roads to see if its sets a new benchmark.

    DETAILS
    13
    photos
    Ever since Honda came to India, the City has been its most consistent performer. However, the petrol-price-bombs of 2011 shook up the City’s standing quite severely and newer competition pushed it up against the wall. However, Honda has come back all guns blazing with its all-new City. Can it sit on top of the growing mid-size heap once more?  
     
    Honda’s engineering brilliance has been embodied by its i-VTEC engines, but this time around, the company is counting on its diesel engine to script the next chapter of its success story in India.  The diesel motor in question is the 1.5-litre i-DTEC that debuted in the Amaze, and the engine itself has been carried over unchanged to the City. The gearbox too is shared with the smaller saloon, and the first five gears are identical, but a new sixth gear has been added specifically for the Honda City. Even though the City is roughly 45kg lighter than the previous-generation car, it is still 90kg heavier than the Amaze, so a shorter ratio is used for the final drive to extract a bit more zing from the 20.4kgm of torque. Despite that, Honda claims that the new City i-DTEC will be the most fuel-efficient car in the country, with a claimed fuel efficiency of 26kpl! We can’t wait to put it through our test cycle in Mumbai to see it for ourselves.
     
    The good news is that the 1.5-litre i-VTEC motor has been carried over virtually unchanged from the previous-generation car. So you have 116bhp of power and 14.8kgm of torque being developed in the same free-revving manner as before. However, light tweaks to the intake and i-VTEC system have improved performance at low speeds. The petrol motor proved to be quite flexible, ambling along happily at 20kph in fourth gear, never hesitating to step forward when prodded. As the revs climbed it proved to be as thrilling to drive as ever.  
     
    On our first drive in Jaipur, it was evident that like in the Amaze, there is hardly any turbo lag, and the flat torque curve is immediately apparent. This diesel engine’s responsiveness even under 2,000rpm was very handy in the cut and thrust of Jaipur’s traffic. Once past the 2,000rpm mark, the motor pulls cleanly to over 3,600rpm, making it hassle-free to drive in the city and outside it. Revving it to its 4,500rpm redline offered little advantage, although it did highlight this motor’s sore point, the engine noise. Since the abundance of engine noise had been highlighted in the Amaze, better sound insulation was almost taken for granted in the Honda City diesel. Sadly, the coarse engine rumble is quite audible in the cabin. Despite this foible, the diesel is sure to hog a big chunk of the sales. True Honda fans though will no doubt be keen to know more about the petrol. 

    Also on offer with the petrol motor is an automatic transmission. This time though it is a CVT which has been built in-house at Honda. This transmission had surprisingly strong responsiveness at low speeds which will make light work of regular city duty. The rubberband effect that made CVTs infamous has been kept well in check too, but during full-bore acceleration runs or urgent overtaking manoeuvres, the engine revs get ahead of the road speed in true CVT fashion. The engine is quite noisy too, which leads us to wonder if Honda has stinted on underbody insulation. But what strengthens the case for the CVT is that it is claimed to be even more fuel efficient than the manual!
     
    Some of the gains in efficiency have to be attributed to the new chassis too. Even though the City is slightly longer, taller and much stiffer than the outgoing car, it is roughly 45kg lighter. The wheelbase has also been stretched by 50mm. Although the Honda City continues to use MacPherson struts at the front and a twist beam at the rear, these have been extensively redesigned for the new platform. At low speeds, on broken roads, the City felt stiff-kneed and jiggly. However, once you get past 40-50kph, the suspension takes on a whole different character and masks broken roads with aplomb. 
     
    The Honda City proved to be quite adept over twisty sections too. Body movement was controlled and  predictable. The narrow 175/65 R15 low-rolling-resistance tyres clung onto the tarmac with more tenacity than was expected. Strong brakes and a well-weighted and accurate steering only tempt you to drive for longer.
     
     
    Step into the rear and it feels like the Honda City has been stretched by 50cm not 50mm. Knee room is ample, the seat base is generous and there’s lots of under-thigh support too. Dedicated air-conditioning vents for the rear passengers and two rear power outlets round off a sumptuous backseat.
    Detailed photo gallery
    Meanwhile, Honda is trying to wow the people in the front seat too, which feels perfectly cushioned. Honda engineers have played around with the foam density to make long stints in the cabin fatigue free. 
     
    The company has been getting some flak for the interiors of its cars and things have changed significantly on the new City. The design looks richer with a silver ‘T’ running across the dash, and the glossy piano black trim adds to the appeal too.  
     
    There’s plenty of equipment on offer as well. The instruments for the driver are big and easy to read, rings around the dials glow blue or green (depending on your driving style), and the chunky steering wheel is a high point, with well damped switches for the music and telephony. After much criticism for its omission in the previous City, the music system brings back a CD player (along with DVD support) as well as the now mandatory Bluetooth and Aux-in. A five-inch screen is the interface for the music system, while the air-conditioning system is operated via a touch panel. And let’s not forget, the City also offers a sunroof. 
     
     
    But while the cabin is well equipped and well specced, it’s not a very cohesive design, and has lots of different elements. The LCD display for the music system looks lost in the vast piano black surface of the centre console. The touchscreen panel for the air-conditioning is fantastic to use and answers City critics who panned the clunky HVAC controls in the previous car. However, the touch-screen display looks a bit fogged up and richer plastics for the dash would have really hit the spot. But there’s no doubt that this cabin indulges its occupants much more than any City before it, and by a long shot.
    Even from outside, this new Honda City is a good looker. Ignore the glaring band of chrome on the grille for a second and you will agree that the slim, almost delicate headlights look quite pleasing. The racy ‘arrowhead’ profile of the earlier City is also in use here. However, this City looks bigger and sits more confidently on the ground, the skinny tyres notwithstanding. The long slash down its flank makes it immediately distinctive too. The rear looks fantastic, with slim lamps spilling onto the boot. Since the car has grown longer by just 20mm and is no wider than the outgoing car, Honda has ensured the City remains apt for urban use.
     
    So Honda’s fourth generation City is undoubtedly its most complete package yet. Its back seat will pamper passengers and the equipment list will rewrite expectations. However, it is the responsive and frugal motors that will form the bedrock for the City’s assault on the mid-size saloon category. All that remains to be seen is whether Honda will price the City more aggressively than before. Company sources say that the Honda City is pegged head-on against the Verna which means an estimated price range of Rs 8.2 lakh to Rs 11.5 lakh. The new Honda City goes on sale next month. 
     
     
     

    Fact File

    Engine
    FuelPetrol / Diesel
    InstallationFront, transverse
    Type1497cc 4 cyl SOHC petrol / 1498cc 4 cyl DOHC diesel
    Power117.3bhp at 6600rpm / 98.6bhp at 3600rpm
    Torque14.7kgm at 4600rpm / 20.39kgm at 1750rpm
    Transmission
    TypeFront wheel drive
    Gearbox5-speed manual, CVT / 6-speed manual
    Dimensions
    Length4440mm
    Width1695mm
    Height1495mm
    Wheel base2600mm
    Boot volume510 litres
    Ground clearance165mm
    Chassis & Body
    Weight1065kg (VX MT), 1085 kg (VX CVT) / 1165kg (VX MT)
    Tyres175/65 R15
    Suspension
    FrontMacPherson strut, coil spring
    RearTorsion beam axle, coil spring
    Steering
    TypeCollapsible, power assisted
    Type of power assistElectric
    Brakes
    FrontDiscs
    RearDrums
    Economy
    Tank size40 litres


    New Mercedes E 63 AMG vs BMW M5

    The slightly unhinged Mercedes E 63 AMG takes on the the positively nuts BMW M5 on the mountain roads, highways, city streets and tracks of India

    27
    photos
    New Mercedes E 63 AMG vs BMW M5
    Clouds roll in, wispy and grey, obscuring our vision. We slow to a crawl. Then, just as smoothly as they roll in, they dissipate, revealing a slick section of moist black tarmac. It twists, it turns, it bends, it loops, it dives and it climbs. It does everything but travel in a straight line. It’s why we love this road; it’s a proper roller coaster.
    The constant drizzle, however, means the road up to Ambavane near Pune and the surrounding greenery are leaching moisture. In places, tiny rivulets trickle across the road and in others there are small pools of standing water. Not ideal conditions in which to unleash a collective 1,102bhp through the rear wheels. So I exercise a bit of caution as the M5 chases the E 63 through a tunnel of green. I caress the throttle instead of giving it a progressively firm shove and I’m smooth with my steering inputs.
    As confidence builds we start to go harder and faster. Up ahead I can see Hormazd through a haze of spray having a ball, the tail of the E 63 stepping out occasionally. Though we’re not using more than 3,500 or 4,000 rpm in each gear, it still equates to approximately 380bhp; much more than you can put down cleanly on a serpentine wet road like this one.
    The rear of the M5 is already doing a bit of a jig. It steps out in small increments as I squeeze the throttle a bit more in tighter corners, and initially it is fun. But the BMW doesn’t really transmit a lot of confidence on a slippery surface and I find myself always on edge, with one half of my brain cringing while the other prepares to execute a synaptic, Bruce Lee-quick steering correction. You’re seldom aware that the car is spinning its wheels on a wet road. And once the rear wheels are goaded into letting go by 69.3kgm of torque from just 1,500rpm – particularly easy considering the traction control is switched off ­– it takes more than feathering the throttle to get them to grip again. So after a few heart-stopping moments, I’m happy to switch to the less frisky MDM mode and have the electronic nannies take over some of the workload. The way the DSC cuts in by cutting power and activating the brakes is quite intrusive, but it provides a much-needed safety net in the wet.
    The M5 is no lithe sportscar, but it is a blisteringly quick sports saloon. It’s been designed to go ballistic without compromising on all the creature comforts expected in a luxury car that seats four (even five) passengers with their luggage. The net result is a car which, in unladen form, tips the scales at 1870kg. But it’s not just the weight (the E 63 too weighs a hefty 1840kg) that is the issue – it’s also the way you feel it when transitioning through corners and accelerating hard. There’s considerable weight transfer, and the way the ultra-responsive twin-turbo V8 spools up makes the big M5 quite a handful on twisty and slippery roads. To their credit, BMW engineers could’ve played it too safe by injecting an overdose of understeer into the chassis, but they didn’t. The result is a car that constantly keeps you on red alert.
    The E 63 AMG has almost the same amount of firepower but is far less intimidating to drive. To begin with, the driving position is better. Unlike in the M5, where the high dashboard gives you the feeling of sitting low, the E 63 offers much better visibility and you can gauge the extremities of the car more easily too; important when apexing from one corner to the next.
    Then there’s the E 63’s electromechanical steering, which feels so much nicer than the M5’s helm. And that’s surprising, because the M Division has swapped the regular 5-series’ electric power steering system for a hydraulic unit that promises more of a natural feel. No doubt, the M5’s steering is quick, accurate and has little slack, but it’s covered in a veil of numbness that doesn’t quite transmit every detail of the road to your fingertips. The AMG’s steering, on the other hand, is more communicative, and though it is a bit lighter, it weighs up in a wonderfully fluid way. 
    Further establishing the friendlier dynamics of the E 63 AMG is the flat and consistent ride. There’s less heaving and diving over bumps and the Merc has far less vertical movement than the M5. The inherent stability of the air-sprung rear suspension with its automatically controlled ride height also allows me to push the car harder and harder, until the rear begins to slither in a friendly manner; a Nascar-like fluttering V8 bark from the exhaust ricocheting across the walls of the mountainside. There’s no doubt, the Merc feels lighter on its feet than the BMW and is the easier to drive of the two.
    The rain has stopped and with the road now drying out, we can completely open up these V8s. Pushing the envelope of the E 63 only cements its reputation. It now feels brutally quick when the engine is extended to 6,000rpm on the short straights and the rear’s lack of roll and quick steering make it a car you can enjoy kilometre after kilometre. What I love most about the 550bhp E 63, however, is how it just shrinks around you when you drive it hard. It may have the external dimensions of a full-size luxury car, but on the move, down this mountain road, it feels not much larger than a C-class.  
    I jump back into the M5 after a good long stint in the AMG, and immediately, on the dry road, it feels much more connected than before. The transition has transformed how much I can enjoy this car and I can put down the power much more confidently. You still need to concentrate, but unlike in the wet, you can carry absurd speeds through corners, all accompanied by the Kalahari lion bellow from the V8.
    Both cars come with automatic transmissions, but the conventional torque-converter slushboxes used in their more pedestrian counterparts have been dropped in favour of performance-oriented, seven-speed twin-clutch units. Both these gearboxes have been programmed to suit the various driving modes in each of the cars, but it’s the M5’s gearbox that’s more enthusiastic and does a better job of extracting the best out of the engine. In manual mode, the E 63’s ’box changes up a gear with an annoying lag at the redline. Hence it’s best to pull the right paddle 200rpm earlier for a quicker upshift. However, it’s the Sport+ mode, where the gearbox automatically and unhesitatingly shifts up at the redline, that yields best results.

    Unlike the E 63, the BMW’s gearbox has a separate multi-stage setting to alter the shift response. In its most aggressive setting, shifts are lightning quick and accompanied by a mild jolt to play to your mood.
    Off the ghat and onward to Pune via the ultra-fast expressway, BMW’s twin-turbo projectile is really delivering the goods. What the M5 does phenomenally well is mask speed. Even on a gentle throttle, it can cruise effortlessly at ridiculous speeds and the numbers on the speedo almost always make you do a double take. Unlike the AMG, which starts losing steam after 5,700rpm, the M5’s V8 pulls hard all the way to its 7,200rpm redline. I click down a couple of gears, mash the throttle at 3,000rpm and the M5’s two saucepan-size turbos deliver an elephant-sized kick to my lower back. The M5 accelerates so hard, it keeps my shoulders pinned to the wide and well-bolstered seat even after I’ve flicked up to the next gear.
    In the real world, it’s the BMW that feels much quicker though, thanks to its freer revving  engine and more brutal delivery of torque. The AMG, with its narrower powerband, feels less exciting in the lower gears. You encounter the relatively conservative redline more often in comparison and you miss winding the engine as much as the BMW’s. The lusty pull of the motor, however, is more evident as you go quicker. In the higher gears, the AMG comes into its element. The surge from 180kph to 220kph feels so quick, it’s scarcely believable.

    The E 63 and M5 run neck and neck when driven flat out, but surprisingly it’s the AMG that’s actually marginally quicker against the clock. 100kph is despatched by the Merc in just 4.86sec, with the M5 just a fraction of a second behind. The Merc keeps its nose ahead till 200kph, but only just. The BMW reaches the double-ton mark in 14.87sec – only 0.31sec behind the Merc; an indication of just how quick these cars are.
    The low, rumbling soundtrack of the AMG sounds deliciously menacing. The BMW is more audible thanks to an exhaust note that’s pumped in the cabin via the speakers! The strange thing, however, is that you just can’t tell. However, it’s the Merc that sounds better overall; the BMW’s exhaust note doesn’t reflect its true sporting intentions. In fact, the M5 is unfortunately louder in an undesirable way – road noise is significantly higher than in the Merc.
    The high speeds we are doing bring the brakes of these cars into focus too. The M5 has the more confidence-inspiring ones, so good in fact that I don’t pay them much attention initially. The huge 15.7-inch rotors are larger than the wheels on many cars and a good squeeze is all they need to haul the M5 down from speeds in excess of 200kph. They don’t feel grabby in the least, they have a ferocious bite and they are superbly weighted. The AMG’s brakes feel well up to the task too, but often call for a second harder squeeze when you are running really quickly.

    But let’s take a break from the lead-footed, supercar-rivalling performance for a moment; which of these cars is more practical for everyday use? Neither, when it comes to fuel bills. These V8s pay lip service when it comes to fuel economy with their stop-start systems; the fact is that they guzzle more than any tippler at Oktoberfest. And it’s not beer, but super expensive 97-octane at an average rate of 3-4kpl. But if you have the wallet for it, these two super saloons are otherwise amazingly practical as everyday cars. With both cars set in their most comfortable suspension, throttle and gearbox settings, and with the most economical driving mode selected, these cars feel comfortable and relaxed, and seem to take suburban Mumbai in their stride. At low speeds, the M5’s seven-speed feels a touch jerky and it’s here that we really miss BMW’s traditional ZF eight-speed torque-converter gearbox. No such issues with the Merc, which has a less abrupt power delivery.
    When we hit the rough patches, as you always do in and around Vashi, it’s the Merc that feels the more comfortable of the two. The M5 thud-thuds more noticeably over the rough stuff, shuffles around a bit more and feels less settled. No, these cars are not as comfortable as a regular E-class or 5-series over poor roads due to their stiff springs, and you do get thumped around, but ride quality in general is pretty acceptable. Should you need to be chauffer-driven, the back seats are just as comfortable as the regular cars as well, with the E-class being the one with the slight advantage. Both also manage to clamber over the large speed breakers in Vashi quite easily, with neither scraping its belly or chin. Yes, we were a little extra careful, but we didn’t have to baby them over like you would a supercar.
    You can only order the E 63 AMG in one trim, and, for Rs 1.29 crore, Mercedes pretty much gives you all the bells and whistles you expect. If you wish to spend a bit less, BMW gives you the choice of dropping plenty of inessential kit, with a ‘base’ price of Rs 1.17 crore. But specify the M5 with the same fully-loaded hardware and its price will shoot up too.

    Verdict

    Both these cars are triumphs of engineering in their own right, combining supercar-rivalling pace with everyday usability. The BMW M5 is clearly the more exciting of the two. A long, lusty pull to the redline in this car is all it takes to get you beaming and the kind of grip and cornering speeds the M5 generates in the dry are simply stupefying. The AMG may not be quite as exciting, but is the more confidence-inspiring of the two. It is easier to drive hard and is certainly the more user-friendly of the two. So the more rounded AMG wins. Still, we just wish it had a bit more of the M5’s rocket sled-like raw appeal and a lower base price.
    Shapur Kotwal